For teachers
Written by students. Works because teachers let it.
STAIRS is four rungs and a five-line pledge for students thinking about their own AI use. Nothing lands in a classroom without you. This page is what you need to know, and what you can use next week.
What it is, shortly
The Ladder is four questions a student can ask themselves before, during, and after using AI on a piece of work: Understand, Attempt, Augment, Own. The Pledge is five lines a student signs to themselves, not to us and not to their school. Neither is a detection tool. Neither reports to anyone.
If you already have an AI policy
Good. STAIRS is meant to sit inside your policy, not replace it. The language is deliberately behavioural (what the student is doing) rather than prescriptive (what the AI is allowed to do). That means it works in schools that allow AI, schools that don’t, and subjects where the right rung is different.
What you can use in the next assignment
- A plain-text Ladder that fits on one page: /ladder.txt. Print it, hand it out, put it on the wall.
- A line you can add to the rubric: “In a short note at the end of your work, tell me which of the four rungs you operated at, and what you got from the AI. Honest disclosure does not affect your grade. Undisclosed AI use does.”
- A one-minute exercise for the first week of term: ask a student to read paragraph three of their draft aloud and explain it without notes. If they can’t, they skipped Rung 4. That’s the whole framework in one minute.
What to ask of your students
Two things. First, that they disclose their AI use honestly on a piece of work, at least once, so the conversation becomes normal. Second, that they can defend what they turn in without the AI open. That’s the entire point of the Ladder compressed into one sentence.
What STAIRS is not
- Not a detection tool. We don’t classify text. We don’t process student work.
- Not a grading rubric. Your professional judgement still decides what’s good.
- Not an integrity enforcement arm. We do not contact your school about your students.
- Not affiliated with any AI company.
Bring it to your school
If you’d like to run STAIRS in your classroom or across a department:
- The content is CC BY-SA 4.0. Adapt it for your context if you need to.
- If you want to be listed as a chapter on the About page, email us.
- If you want to hear how other teachers have used it in class, ask [EDIT: named contact] via hello@stairspledge.org.
Where this sits alongside official guidance
Ministries and national bodies are writing their own frameworks. STAIRS is compatible with all of them we’ve read. The Ladder is what a student can do today, on the assignment in front of them, without waiting for the policy to land.
- Singapore — MOE AI-in-Education Ethics Framework.
- Australia — Australian Framework for Generative AI in Schools.
- United Kingdom — Department for Education guidance (2025).
The evidence we’re working from
- Stanford AI Index 2026, Chapter 7 (Education). The reference survey: roughly four in five U.S. high school and college students now use AI for schoolwork (up from two in five in 2023); only about half of middle and high schools have an AI policy at all; just 6% of teachers say their school’s policy is clear; 47% of students have wanted to use AI on schoolwork but were unsure if it was allowed.
- MIT Media Lab — Your Brain on ChatGPT. EEG study, 2025: LLM-assisted essay writers showed the weakest brain connectivity, the lowest sense of ownership, and the greatest difficulty quoting their own work.
- Microsoft & Carnegie Mellon — Critical Thinking & GenAI (CHI 2025). The more confident users were in the AI, the less critical thinking they did.
- Anthropic Education Report (2025). Across a million student conversations, about 47% were “direct” — asking for an answer with little engagement.